Just Plain Bill
What might be at the “core” of resistance to Common Core
The questions of
what school children should be taught and what teachers should be accountable
for teaching are once again being hashed out in the public square.
“Wise” from my many
years of teaching in public schools, institutions of higher learning, and
corporate training and development, I have an opinion that I feel is worth
sharing. Although my observation may not be as robust and scientific as all the
chatter we’ve been hearing, I believe it belongs in the discussion.
My opinion
focuses on the impractical, extreme time demand put on teachers for creating
new learning activities to match new learning objectives. Lessons and methods
used year after year by experienced teachers are now obsolete, or soon will be,
because they are based on now outdated curriculum standards because of the
world in which we live. Think for just a moment of the preschooler tapping and
sliding fingers across her tablet. Technology hastened the demise of
traditional needs to teach handwriting and math to name just two examples.
Tools replacing penmanship and multiplication memorization are literally at a
student’s fingertips.
I clearly
remember that the learning activities my children experienced over a 20-year
period involved many well-worn exercises (even to a point the copies were
barely legible). They reflected little change generation-to-generation, between
the youngest and oldest, for completing their public school requirements.
In short, the “core”
of resistance to Common Core may be the requirement that teachers stop using
exercises and materials they had developed over the years. For many, those
lessons represent their best professional efforts and now they are required to
spend an enormous amount of time and labor creating new learning activities –
time they do not have! It’s a lot of work and I am speaking with the voice of
experience. I still invest at least eight hours for every one hour of
instruction I produce in the world of corporate training for adult learners.
Not sure how to
address this basic “core” of resistance, except to provide ready-made and
proven materials to the modern teacher charged with teaching a whole new way,
to a whole new set of objectives, in a whole new world. This surely treads on
the sacred ground of all good teachers…creating their own customized materials.
Perhaps a paid “working sabbatical”, such as a full year of learning activity
development just for teachers? It’s part of a solution that may be impossible
to even consider, with Common Core mired in politics (e.g. big government vs.
state rights) and enforced by financial “incentives”.
Sounds like a
conundrum, eh?
Heaps of credit and thanks to my awesome editor, friend,
and fellow educator, Allyn Geer, for enriching my post.
No comments:
Post a Comment